<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Steve Z Adventure Photography &#187; Travel Photography, Boulder Colorado Sports &amp; Randomness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.steve-z.com/tags/dimes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.steve-z.com</link>
	<description>Travel &#124; Lifestyle &#124; Sports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:16:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>I got a new lens today</title>
		<link>http://www.steve-z.com/45mm-vs-85mm-pc-e-lens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.steve-z.com/45mm-vs-85mm-pc-e-lens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 22:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stevez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photo Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[45mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[45mm lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[85]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[85mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[85mm lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fisheye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loose change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nickles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC-E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photographer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portraits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quarters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat penny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steve-z.com/?p=4830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As anyone who knows me knows, I really like the tilt shift. The limitless versatility allowed by changing the angle of the focal plane keeps the latent scientist in me entertained for hours. I&#8217;ve been using the 45mm version since way back in my Canon days of last year. When I switched to Nikon, I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As anyone who knows me knows, I really like the tilt shift. The limitless versatility allowed by changing the angle of the focal plane keeps the latent scientist in me entertained for hours.  I&#8217;ve been using the 45mm version since way back in my Canon days of last year. When I switched to Nikon, I purchased the superior Nikon 45mm PC-E lens.  The Nikon version allows for the added feature of being a 1:2 macro lens, which comes in handy for the ring shots and close up shots of eyeballs.  The 45 is a standard lens, which means it can be used for landscapes and portraits, it&#8217;s right in the middle of the focal range.  But it still is a little bit wide angle for a close up portrait, and sometimes I like my ring shots a little tighter, so I&#8217;ve been thinking about the 85mm version. But, at $1600, the new PC-E version is quite expensive.  Well, I found a used older version of the lens, the 85mm PC on the DWF classifieds.  The major difference is that the camera body can&#8217;t control the aperture, you have to adjust it manually.  But, I figured I&#8217;d give the lens a try, and if I really use it a lot I might pony up the cash for the new version someday.  Optically, I think they are mostly the same, minus some new lens coatings.</p>
<p>Well the lens came today, and I&#8217;m pretty excited about a new lens that I&#8217;ve never owned before.  I took a couple sample shots here in the office, to compare the 85 to the 45.  The differences probably aren&#8217;t huge to the untrained eye, but to me they are pretty significant!  To me it&#8217;s easy to see how the 45 still has a wide angle effect to it, as seen in this first shot of the loose change on the window sill.   In the 45 shot, it looks like the dime and the nickel are at different angles, while they appear more parallel in the 2nd shot.  Interestingly, the lens causes the camera to perceive that the coins are at different angles, as you can see that the amount of reflected light off the silver coins is much different in the 45mm image than the 85mm image.  Also notice how I shot the stacks of coins at an angle, but aligned the focal plane along the tops of the coins, leaving the change below blurred out. This is what I jokingly call using the tilt shift &#8220;The Right Way&#8221;, when you are intentionally aligning things with the focal plane.  Both of these lenses are excellently sharp, even hand held wide open at f/2.8.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 940px"><img class=" " title="Loose Change Seen Through Nikon 45mm PC-E Lens" src="/images/2009/loose_change_comp.jpg" alt="" width="930" height="735" /><p class="wp-caption-text">left- 45mm .:. right- 85mm </p></div>
<p>Secondly I took a couple silly pictures of Richie in the foyer.  Once again, the 45 has more of a wide angle to it.  In this particular composition, I like the 45mm better.   But I&#8217;m pretty sure that if I was doing a close in headshot, that I&#8217;d like the more flattering flatness of the 85mm.  In both these shots I&#8217;m using the lens &#8221; The Wrong Way&#8221;, where I use the angled focal plane to blur out everything but the eyes.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 940px"><img class=" " title="Goofy Assistant Pondering About the Foliage in his Mouth Seen Through Nikon 45mm PC-E Lens" src="/images/2009/richie_comp.jpg" alt="" width="930" height="735" /><p class="wp-caption-text">left- 45mm .:. right- 85mm </p></div>
<p>Now I acknowledge wasn&#8217;t a particularly scientific &#8220;test&#8221; by any means. I didn&#8217;t even do a very good job of keeping the subjects face at the same angle so that you can compare the shots.  This was just an excuse to play with my new toy and to make funny faces for the blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steve-z.com/45mm-vs-85mm-pc-e-lens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

