<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 vs Nikon 135 f/2.0 Lens Comparision Test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.steve-z.com/sigma-vs-nikon-lens-comparision-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.steve-z.com/sigma-vs-nikon-lens-comparision-test/</link>
	<description>Travel &#124; Lifestyle &#124; Sports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:51:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: August Heisler</title>
		<link>http://www.steve-z.com/sigma-vs-nikon-lens-comparision-test/comment-page-1/#comment-57127</link>
		<dc:creator>August Heisler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 03:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steve-z.com/?p=4646#comment-57127</guid>
		<description>What a GREAAAAAT explanation!! I love when the time is taken for great detail and depth.

For my first low aperture lens years ago, I choose to go with that very Sigma 70-200 along with the collection of other starter Nikkor Lenses. You have no idea how happy I am with your conclusions! I&#039;ve been using this Sigma lens for about 2 years now and very pleased with it. It makes me feel a little more solid to know that you&#039;re working with the same lens! 

Love your work man</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a GREAAAAAT explanation!! I love when the time is taken for great detail and depth.</p>
<p>For my first low aperture lens years ago, I choose to go with that very Sigma 70-200 along with the collection of other starter Nikkor Lenses. You have no idea how happy I am with your conclusions! I&#8217;ve been using this Sigma lens for about 2 years now and very pleased with it. It makes me feel a little more solid to know that you&#8217;re working with the same lens! </p>
<p>Love your work man</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Z</title>
		<link>http://www.steve-z.com/sigma-vs-nikon-lens-comparision-test/comment-page-1/#comment-55502</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 22:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steve-z.com/?p=4646#comment-55502</guid>
		<description>No kidding, this is what I did instead of mountain biking, or going to Creek Fest, or really any other host of things normal people do on a Saturday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No kidding, this is what I did instead of mountain biking, or going to Creek Fest, or really any other host of things normal people do on a Saturday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chad</title>
		<link>http://www.steve-z.com/sigma-vs-nikon-lens-comparision-test/comment-page-1/#comment-55501</link>
		<dc:creator>chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 22:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steve-z.com/?p=4646#comment-55501</guid>
		<description>wow, this post is FULL dork!  very interesting though!!  thanks steveZ!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, this post is FULL dork!  very interesting though!!  thanks steveZ!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

